Well-being: Subjective and Objective Aspects / E. Alatartseva, G. A. Barysheva

Уровень набора: (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\2898, Procedia - Social and Behavioral SciencesОсновной Автор-лицо: Alatartseva, E.Альтернативный автор-лицо: Barysheva, G. A., Economist, Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of economic sciences (DSc), 1961-, Galina AnzelmovnaКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)Язык: английский.Резюме или реферат: The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society.; Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society..Примечания о наличии в документе библиографии/указателя: [References: р. 42 (10 tit.)].Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | subjective well-being | Ill-being | sustainable development | human development | human society | socio-economic aspects | moral-psychological aspects | субъективное благополучие | устойчивое развитие | человеческое общество | социально-экономические аспекты | благосостояние Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн | Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

[References: р. 42 (10 tit.)]

The subject of well-being has always excited human society. Various official and scientific research documents have sought to outline the design and content of well-being, but the specific definition depends on the conceptual approach employed: the process, system, or other aspect. The purpose of this research is to create an integrated, multi-component model that can ensure the continued well-being of modern man. The modern man can be defined with regard to two levels of well-being: internal (subjective) and external (objective). Inner well-being is seen as a human, spiritual well-being associated with one's personal characteristics and features. External well-being develops from the perspective of perception and one's evaluation of human society.

Each level consists of four key contextual attributes that together constitute well-being: 1) one's existence in accordance with their natural essence (in harmony with others and the environment); 2) an innate understanding of what is good for oneself, and the presence of the ability and willingness to achieve it; 3) one's the ability to realize their human potential and plan for life; 4) the creation of a society and empowering people to fulfill the above stated positions 1, 2, 3, and increase activity and awareness. Such specification of the category “well-being” gives us an opportunity to distinguish between personal well-being of an individual and social well-being of member of society and state. Only discoursing in the framework of such conceptually comprehensive logic, it is possible to derive the “formula” of the well-being of human and society.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.