Social Wellbeing as a Criterion of Structural Policy Efficiency / M. A. Gasanov, S. A. Zhironkin

Уровень набора: (RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS)Основной Автор-лицо: Gasanov, M. A., Economist, Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of economic sciences (DSc), 1963-, Magerram Ali OglyАльтернативный автор-лицо: Zhironkin, S. A., economist, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences, 1975-, Sergey AleksandrovichКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)Язык: английский.Резюме или реферат: Social wellbeing of nation is not only a constitutional goal of the state, but, above all, the quintessence of all large-scale economic and political transformations. In Russian economy the gap between the objectives of social and structural policy is broadening. As a result, in the course of reforms the "vicious circle" of structural problems and reducing the wellbeing of Russians arose and deepens now. This circle consists of the following problems: de-industrialization of Russian economy - decreasing of social wellbeing – decreasing of the necessary for neo-industrialization of economy stable social group - the weakening of factors targeted to the structural changes - the continuation of de-industrialization. Structural economic changes along with the improvement of macroeconomic dynamics should be aimed at socially important priorities of economic development, without exception. In that context, we suppose the ultimate criterion of structural changes to be the growth of social wellbeing of Russians by increasing labor productivity, the establishment of new high-tech industries, and the formation of new sustainable social groups in the neo-industrialization of Russian economy..Примечания о наличии в документе библиографии/указателя: [References: p. 123 (21 tit.)].Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | социальное благополучие | структура | экономика | индустриализация | неоиндустриализация | социальные группы Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн | Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

[References: p. 123 (21 tit.)]

Social wellbeing of nation is not only a constitutional goal of the state, but, above all, the quintessence of all large-scale economic and political transformations. In Russian economy the gap between the objectives of social and structural policy is broadening. As a result, in the course of reforms the "vicious circle" of structural problems and reducing the wellbeing of Russians arose and deepens now. This circle consists of the following problems: de-industrialization of Russian economy - decreasing of social wellbeing – decreasing of the necessary for neo-industrialization of economy stable social group - the weakening of factors targeted to the structural changes - the continuation of de-industrialization. Structural economic changes along with the improvement of macroeconomic dynamics should be aimed at socially important priorities of economic development, without exception. In that context, we suppose the ultimate criterion of structural changes to be the growth of social wellbeing of Russians by increasing labor productivity, the establishment of new high-tech industries, and the formation of new sustainable social groups in the neo-industrialization of Russian economy.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.