Comparative Analysis of Economic and Social Results of Foreign and Domestic Firms: Case Russian Electronic Industry / V. V. Spitsin, A. A. Mikhalchuk, L. Yu. Spitsina (Spitsyna) [et al.]

Альтернативный автор-лицо: Spitsin, V. V., economist, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences, 1976-, Vladislav Vladimirovich;Mikhalchuk, A. A., mathematician, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, 1954-, Aleksandr Alexandrovich;Spitsina (Spitsyna), L. Yu., Economist, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences, 1976-, Lubov Yurievna;Shabaldina, N. V., Nataliya Vladimirovna;Novoseltseva, D. A., Darjya AndreevnaКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра менеджмента (МЕН);Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Физико-технический институт (ФТИ), Кафедра высшей математики и математической физики (ВММФ);Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра экономики (ЭКОН)Язык: английский.Резюме или реферат: This research focuses on investigating and comparing economic and social results of foreign and joint (FJO) and domestic (Russian – RO) enterprises. We analyze the differences between FJO and RO enterprises for the subsection DL “Manufacture of electrical and optical equipment”. Multivariate statistical analysis of subsection DL enterprises, broken down by forms of ownership, is performed at the Russian regional level. Based on correlation, cluster and factor analysis of the 23 initial indicators, 14 new factorial indicators are formed. Comparing the average values between the factorial indicators we revealed the following statistically significant differences. In subsection DL FJO enterprises are smaller than RO enterprises. They have significantly lower labor intensity and payroll-output ratio but higher average salary than the RO enterprises. FJO enterprises invest a large part of the funds for the purchase of foreign machinery and equipment. At the same time they have higher share of material costs and payroll in shipped products than the RO ones. Our analysis did not confirm a higher investment activity and growth rates of FJO enterprises in subsection DL during the post-crisis period 2010-2013..Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

This research focuses on investigating and comparing economic and social results of foreign and joint (FJO) and domestic (Russian – RO) enterprises. We analyze the differences between FJO and RO enterprises for the subsection DL “Manufacture of electrical and optical equipment”. Multivariate statistical analysis of subsection DL enterprises, broken down by forms of ownership, is performed at the Russian regional level. Based on correlation, cluster and factor analysis of the 23 initial indicators, 14 new factorial indicators are formed. Comparing the average values between the factorial indicators we revealed the following statistically significant differences. In subsection DL FJO enterprises are smaller than RO enterprises. They have significantly lower labor intensity and payroll-output ratio but higher average salary than the RO enterprises. FJO enterprises invest a large part of the funds for the purchase of foreign machinery and equipment. At the same time they have higher share of material costs and payroll in shipped products than the RO ones. Our analysis did not confirm a higher investment activity and growth rates of FJO enterprises in subsection DL during the post-crisis period 2010-2013.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.