KTM Tokamak Operation Scenarios Software Infrastructure / V. M. Pavlov [et al.]

Уровень набора: Nuclear Engineering and TechnologyАльтернативный автор-лицо: Pavlov, V. M., specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of technical sciences, 1965-, Vadim Mikhailovich;Baystrukov, K. I., physicist, senior teacher Tomsk Polytechnic University, 1966-, Konstantin Ivanovich;Golobokov, Yu. N., specialist in the field of nuclear engineering, engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 1982-, Yury Nikolaevich;Ovchinnikov, A. V., Anton Viktorovich;Lee, A. M., Specialist in the field of informatics and computer technology, Programmer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Postgraduate, 1986-, Aleksey Mikhailovich;Tazhibaeva, I. L., Irina Lashkarovna;Shapovalov, G. V., Gennady Voadimirovich;Merkulov, S. V., Specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics, Design Engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 1977-, Stepan Vadimovich;Mezentsev, A. A., Specialist in the field of automation equipment and electronics, Assistant of the Department of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 1984-, Anton AlekseevichКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Физико-технический институт (ФТИ), Кафедра электроники и автоматики физических установок (№ 24) (ЭАФУ)Язык: английский.Страна: .Резюме или реферат: One of the largest problems for tokamak devices such as Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material Testing (KTM) is the operation scenarios' development and execution. Operation scenarios may be varied often, so a convenient hardware and software solution is required for scenario management and execution. Dozens of diagnostic and control subsystems with numerous configuration settings may be used in an experiment, so it is required to automate the subsystem configuration process to coordinate changes of the related settings and to prevent errors. Most of the diagnostic and control subsystems software at KTM was unified using an extra software layer, describing the hardware abstraction interface. The experiment sequence was described using a command language.The whole infrastructure was brought together by a universal communication protocol supporting various media, including Ethernet and serial links. The operation sequence execution infrastructure was used at KTM to carry out plasma experiments..Примечания о наличии в документе библиографии/указателя: [References: p. 674 (8 tit.)].Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | токамак КТМ | автоматическое управление | программное обеспечение Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

[References: p. 674 (8 tit.)]

One of the largest problems for tokamak devices such as Kazakhstan Tokamak for Material Testing (KTM) is the operation scenarios' development and execution. Operation scenarios may be varied often, so a convenient hardware and software solution is required for scenario management and execution. Dozens of diagnostic and control subsystems with numerous configuration settings may be used in an experiment, so it is required to automate the subsystem configuration process to coordinate changes of the related settings and to prevent errors. Most of the diagnostic and control subsystems software at KTM was unified using an extra software layer, describing the hardware abstraction interface. The experiment sequence was described using a command language.The whole infrastructure was brought together by a universal communication protocol supporting various media, including Ethernet and serial links. The operation sequence execution infrastructure was used at KTM to carry out plasma experiments.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.