“There is nothing more permanent than something temporary”: The problem of endless transition periods in historiography of Russian economic wellbeing / V. V. Ageeva [et al.]

Уровень набора: SGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts, conference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016 = 2016Альтернативный автор-лицо: Ageeva, V. V., historian, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of historical sciences, 1986-, Vera Valentinovna;Selevich, T. S., economist, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences, 1980-, Tatiana Semenovna;Levashkina, Z. N., Zoya Nikolaevna;Galkina, P. V., Polina VadimovnaКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра истории и философии науки и техники (ИФНТ);Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ), Институт социально-гуманитарных технологий (ИСГТ), Кафедра инженерного предпринимательства (ИП)Язык: английский.Страна: .Резюме или реферат: The problem of transition periods in Russian economy is one of the key points among the Russian Studies’ discussions in our country as well as abroad. The concept of “transitional period of Russian economy” is often associated with radical economic reforms of the 1990s, however, the use of the term “transition period” has a long historical tradition in Russian and Soviet economical mind. The objective of this article is to define the main trends of modern historiography in studies of long and numerous economic transitions in Russian history of the 19th and 20th centuries as factors of economic wellbeing. The authors discuss one of the sustainable practices of Russian economic transitions - the inevitable and long-term preservation of socio-economic and political anachronisms that occurs every time when the government tried to overcome the gap between Russia and advanced countries, the economic leaders. Research results show historiographical interest in the development of unique Russian combinations of economic phenomena such as “state capitalism”, “conservative reformism”, “socialistic monopolism”, “radical liberal reforms” which accompanied the five stages of system Russian modernization..Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | экономическое благополучие | переходный период | российская история | экономическая модернизация | государственный капитализм Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

The problem of transition periods in Russian economy is one of the key points among the Russian Studies’ discussions in our country as well as abroad. The concept of “transitional period of Russian economy” is often associated with radical economic reforms of the 1990s, however, the use of the term “transition period” has a long historical tradition in Russian and Soviet economical mind. The objective of this article is to define the main trends of modern historiography in studies of long and numerous economic transitions in Russian history of the 19th and 20th centuries as factors of economic wellbeing. The authors discuss one of the sustainable practices of Russian economic transitions - the inevitable and long-term preservation of socio-economic and political anachronisms that occurs every time when the government tried to overcome the gap between Russia and advanced countries, the economic leaders. Research results show historiographical interest in the development of unique Russian combinations of economic phenomena such as “state capitalism”, “conservative reformism”, “socialistic monopolism”, “radical liberal reforms” which accompanied the five stages of system Russian modernization.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.