The relevance of mixed methods for network analysis in tourism and hospitality research / M. Mariani, R. Baggio

Уровень набора: International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality ManagementОсновной Автор-лицо: Mariani, M., MarcelloАльтернативный автор-лицо: Baggio, R., Italian expert, philosopher, Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of philosophical Sciences, 1951-, RodolfoКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет, Школа базовой инженерной подготовки, Отделение социально-гуманитарных наукЯзык: английский.Резюме или реферат: Purpose Taking stock of extant hospitality and tourism research using social network analysis approaches, this study highlights why using either quantitative or qualitative approaches to examine social networks can be misleading and generate potentially biased findings. Indeed, purely qualitative and purely quantitative studies display limitations. The purpose of this study is to provide methodological insights by suggesting that mixed methods can be suitably used, depending on the specific research questions. Design/methodology/approach The study consists of an analysis and critical discussion of the methods used in a number of papers leveraging social network approaches to study social networks in tourism and hospitality. The authors describe the benefits and limitations of each method studies considered are examined based on a number of aspects.; Findings More than half of the studies classified as network studies adopt quantitative designs and quantitative methods including statistical analyses and observational data. Mixed methods study is a minority and they are almost never labeled as mixed methods. A relevant portion of qualitative studies increasingly embeds a number of rudimentary statistical analyses. With an example, the authors also discuss that purely quantitative or purely qualitative methods can lead to discrepant results, and thus, the authors encourage scholars to embrace mixed method research designs such as explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. Advanced researchers might attempt in the future to embrace transformative, embedded or multiphase mixed methods. Research limitations/implications This study is based on academic papers and research published before 2019. A rich research agenda is designed. Originality/value This study contributes to explore the way social networks have been dealt with in tourism and hospitality research so far, by advancing a proposal to adopt mixed methods in the form of explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. To the best of the knowledge, it is the first study addressing methodological pitfalls in extant network-based research within the tourism and hospitality domain..Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | tourism | туризм | network analysis | сетевой анализ | quantitative methods | количественные методы | hospitality | гостеприимство | mixed methods Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

Purpose Taking stock of extant hospitality and tourism research using social network analysis approaches, this study highlights why using either quantitative or qualitative approaches to examine social networks can be misleading and generate potentially biased findings. Indeed, purely qualitative and purely quantitative studies display limitations. The purpose of this study is to provide methodological insights by suggesting that mixed methods can be suitably used, depending on the specific research questions. Design/methodology/approach The study consists of an analysis and critical discussion of the methods used in a number of papers leveraging social network approaches to study social networks in tourism and hospitality. The authors describe the benefits and limitations of each method studies considered are examined based on a number of aspects.

Findings More than half of the studies classified as network studies adopt quantitative designs and quantitative methods including statistical analyses and observational data. Mixed methods study is a minority and they are almost never labeled as mixed methods. A relevant portion of qualitative studies increasingly embeds a number of rudimentary statistical analyses. With an example, the authors also discuss that purely quantitative or purely qualitative methods can lead to discrepant results, and thus, the authors encourage scholars to embrace mixed method research designs such as explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. Advanced researchers might attempt in the future to embrace transformative, embedded or multiphase mixed methods. Research limitations/implications This study is based on academic papers and research published before 2019. A rich research agenda is designed. Originality/value This study contributes to explore the way social networks have been dealt with in tourism and hospitality research so far, by advancing a proposal to adopt mixed methods in the form of explanatory or exploratory sequential designs. To the best of the knowledge, it is the first study addressing methodological pitfalls in extant network-based research within the tourism and hospitality domain.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.