Performance of Two Types of High Speed, High EfficiencyAxisymmetric Intakes / V. M. Galkin, V. M. Fomin, M. Sannu [et al.]

Уровень набора: Journal of Applied and Computational MechanicsАльтернативный автор-лицо: Galkin, V. M., Geologist, Associate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, 1955-, Vladislav Mikhailovich;Fomin, V. M., физик, действительный член РАН (2006), директор ИТПМ СО РАН (с 1989 г.), доктор физико-математических наук (1984), профессор (1987), 1940-, Vasily Mikhaylovich;Sannu, M., Molder;Vnuchkov, D. A., Dmitry Aleksandrovich;Zvegintsev, V. I., Valery IvanovichКоллективный автор (вторичный): Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет, Инженерная школа природных ресурсов, Отделение нефтегазового делаЯзык: английский.Резюме или реферат: Performance of two axisymmetric air intakes are compared at conditions suitable for Mach number range from 2 to 8.First is the Busemann intake and second is the reversed isentropic nozzle. The isentropic nozzle is built by the method ofcharacteristics. The contour of this nozzle is taken as a compression surface for the incoming flow. Performances of these twointakes are compared by comparison of both viscous and inviscid CFD calculations at Mach 6. Viscous flow calculations showthat the total pressure recovery in compression section is 0.8316 in the Busemann intake and 0.869 in the reversed isentropicnozzle intake..Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | supersonic | air intake | near-isentropic compression | total pressure recoveryý Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайн
Тэги из этой библиотеки: Нет тэгов из этой библиотеки для этого заглавия. Авторизуйтесь, чтобы добавить теги.
Оценка
    Средний рейтинг: 0.0 (0 голосов)
Нет реальных экземпляров для этой записи

Title screen

Performance of two axisymmetric air intakes are compared at conditions suitable for Mach number range from 2 to 8.First is the Busemann intake and second is the reversed isentropic nozzle. The isentropic nozzle is built by the method ofcharacteristics. The contour of this nozzle is taken as a compression surface for the incoming flow. Performances of these twointakes are compared by comparison of both viscous and inviscid CFD calculations at Mach 6. Viscous flow calculations showthat the total pressure recovery in compression section is 0.8316 in the Busemann intake and 0.869 in the reversed isentropicnozzle intake.

Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.

оставить комментарий.