000 | 07266nla2a2200613 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 267749 | ||
005 | 20231029214817.0 | ||
035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\book\290833 | ||
035 | _aRU\TPU\book\290783 | ||
090 | _a267749 | ||
100 | _a20140806d2014 k y0rusy50 ba | ||
101 | 0 | _aeng | |
102 | _aRU | ||
135 | _adrnn ---uucaa | ||
181 | 0 | _ai | |
182 | 0 | _ab | |
200 | 1 |
_aReaching the nonexistent community: foundations for a philosophy of societal future _bElectronic resource _fE. Fell, A. I. Naletova |
|
203 |
_aТекст _cэлектронный |
||
215 | _a1 файл (116 Kb) | ||
225 | 1 | _aСоциально-гуманитарные технологии | |
230 | _aЭлектронные текстовые данные (1 файл : 116 Kb) | ||
300 | _aЗаглавие с титульного листа | ||
300 | _aЭлектронная версия печатной публикации | ||
320 | _a[Библиогр.: с. 56 (20 назв.)] | ||
330 | _aThe urgency of the discussed issue is caused by the need to care about the future - our own and that of our children. We also care about what happens to those generations of people which will populate this planet hundreds of years from now. The sense of future-orientated societal responsibility is reinforced in media, political rhetoric and social theorising. Philosophers and social theorists offer a variety of approaches that aim to safeguard and promote the welfare of future people, but these approaches are diverse and sometimes conflicting. The aim of the research is to emphasize the attitude towards the future in today's society. The methods used in the study: comparative analysis of philosophical theories of the future; synthesis of the main positions and conclusions regarding the understanding of the category "Future"; classification of human capabilities, and a summary of the main results of the classification. The results: The caring attitude towards future is the outer layer of the relational network that the present community members have with the future community. This attitude takes a form of an agent-centred ethical approach, where the patient of our future-orientated intentionality is absent and unable to initiate a demand on our morality or a response to our actions. | ||
330 | _aСтатья посвящена вопросу заботы о будущем настоящих и последующих поколений. Авторами рассматриваются современные теории, затрагивающие этот вопрос: теория справедливости Джона Роллза, теория общественного признания Акселя Хоннета, а также анализируется позиция Амартии Сена и Марты Нюсбаум, касающаяся реализации человеческих возможностей, степень которой выступает как критерий социальной справедливости. Цель исследования - подчеркнуть отношение к будущему в современном обществе. Методы, используемые в исследовании: сравнительный анализ философских теорий будущего; синтез основных положений и выводов, касающихся понимания категории "Будущее". Результаты: Авторы приходят к выводу, что тема заботы о будущем представляет собой лишь внешнюю, видимую оболочку сложных отношений настоящего поколения к будущим поколениям. В основе этих отношений остаются собственно интересы настоящего поколения. | ||
330 | _aThe urgency of the discussed issue is caused by the need to care about the future - our own and that of our children. We also care about what happens to those generations of people which will populate this planet hundreds of years from now. The sense of future-orientated societal responsibility is reinforced in media, political rhetoric and social theorising. Philosophers and social theorists offer a variety of approaches that aim to safeguard and promote the welfare of future people, but these approaches are diverse and sometimes conflicting. The aim of the research is to emphasize the attitude towards the future in today's society. The methods used in the study: comparative analysis of philosophical theories of the future; synthesis of the main positions and conclusions regarding the understanding of the category "Future"; classification of human capabilities, and a summary of the main results of the classification. The results: The caring attitude towards future is the outer layer of the relational network that the present community members have with the future community. This attitude takes a form of an agent-centred ethical approach, where the patient of our future-orientated intentionality is absent and unable to initiate a demand on our morality or a response to our actions. | ||
337 | _aAdobe Reader | ||
453 |
_tReaching the nonexistent community: foundations for a philosophy of societal future _fE. Fell, A. I. Naletova _d2014 _aFell, Elena |
||
453 | _tBulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University | ||
453 | _tVol. 324, № 6 : Humanities and Social Sciences Technologies | ||
461 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\book\176237 _tИзвестия Томского политехнического университета [Известия ТПУ] _fТомский политехнический университет (ТПУ) _d2000- |
|
463 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\book\290780 _x1684-8519 _tТ. 324, № 6 : Социально-гуманитарные технологии _v[С. 47-56] _d2014 _p158 с. |
|
610 | 1 | _aбудущее | |
610 | 1 | _aвидение | |
610 | 1 | _aсообщества | |
610 | 1 | _aсуществование | |
610 | 1 | _aчеловеческие способности | |
610 | 1 | _aчеловек | |
610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
610 | _avision of future | ||
610 | _acommunity | ||
610 | _aexistence | ||
610 | _ahuman capabilities | ||
610 | _arelation with future | ||
610 | _ahuman beings | ||
700 | 1 |
_aFell _bE. V. _cspecialist in the field of law _cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University _f1975- _gElena Vladimirovna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33614 |
|
701 | 1 |
_aNaletova _bA. I. _cspecialist in the field of Humanities Sciences _cPostgraduate, Assistant of the Department of Tomsk Polytechnic University _f1987- _gAlexandra Ivanovna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32548 _6z02712 |
|
712 | 0 | 2 |
_aUniversity of Central Lancashire _cPreston _6z01700 |
712 | 0 | 2 |
_aNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18773 _6z02701 |
801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20190517 _gPSBO |
|
856 | 4 | _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/bitstream/11683/5268/1/bulletin_tpu-2014-324-6-05.pdf | |
942 | _cCF |