| 000 | 01970naa2a2200325 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 570936 | ||
| 005 | 20231030032025.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\268682 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\prd\268681 | ||
| 090 | _a570936 | ||
| 100 | _a20170111a2016 k y0rusy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 102 | _aRU | ||
| 135 | _adrcn ---uucaa | ||
| 200 | 1 |
_aComparison of non-linear, linearized 2nd order and reduced to FOPDT models of CSTR using different tuning methods _bElectronic resource _fMunna Kumar, R. S. Singh |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 320 | _a[References: p. S75 (17 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | _aProcess modelling and design of controller based on the process model is an important step in the process control. In the present study three different mathematical models i.e. non-linear process model, linearized 2nd order model and first order with dead time (FOPDT) model of a CSTR with the concentration of output of product as controlled parameter were developed. Proportional Integral (PI) controllers were designed based on 2nd order and FOPDT models of a CSTR using SIMC (Skogestad internal model control), Hagglund and Astrom, and a computational method with 5% overshoot. In all the three tuning methods, the nonlinear model provided better results in terms of various time parameters (Tr, Ty, Ts) and in error analysis (IAE, ITAE and ISE). | ||
| 461 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\247369 _x2405-6537 _tResource-Efficient Technologies _oelectronic scientific journal _fNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) _d2015- |
|
| 463 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\268664 _tVol. 2, Suppl. 1 _v[P. S71–S75] _d2016 |
|
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aПИ-регуляторы | |
| 700 | 0 | _aMunna Kumar | |
| 701 | 1 |
_aSingh _bR. S. |
|
| 801 | 1 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20090623 _gPSBO |
|
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20180830 _gPSBO |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/50238 | |
| 942 | _cBK | ||