000 | 02192naa2a2200469 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 582338 | ||
005 | 20231030032845.0 | ||
035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\282608 | ||
090 | _a582338 | ||
100 | _a20190114a2018 k y0engy50 ba | ||
101 | 0 | _aeng | |
102 | _aRU | ||
135 | _adrcn ---uucaa | ||
181 | 0 | _ai | |
182 | 0 | _ab | |
200 | 1 |
_aSpecificity of psychoanalysis in science _fA. Averkiev |
|
203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
215 | _a1 файл (252 Кб) | ||
225 | 1 | _aСоциологические науки | |
230 | _aЭлектронные текстовые данные (1 файл : 252 Кб) | ||
300 | _aTitle screen | ||
320 | _a[References: 19 tit.] | ||
330 | _aPsychoanalysis today is a whole trend in culture. It has gone far ahead of its naturalistic basis. Its individual branches no longer have a direct connection with the founder of the teaching. The paper presents analysis of the scientific and social status of psychoanalysis. The evolution of psychoanalytic teaching, its methodological and epistemological specificity are considered. The main directions of philosophical and scientific research are highlighted in which the use of psychoanalytic ideas and methods may have a heuristic value for science and philosophy. Scientific research methods will include study, analysis, synthesis, comparison of scientific literature on the topic of the paper. | ||
461 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\225573 _x2312-2978 _tJournal of Economics and Social Sciences _oelectronic scientific journal _d2012- |
|
463 | 1 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\prd\282526 _t№ 13 _v[11 p.] _d2018 |
|
610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
610 | 1 | _arationality | |
610 | 1 | _ahermeneutics | |
610 | 1 | _ascience | |
610 | 1 | _aphilosophy | |
610 | 1 | _aS. Freud | |
610 | 1 | _apsychoanalysis | |
610 | 1 | _aрациональность | |
610 | 1 | _aгерменевтика | |
610 | 1 | _aнаука | |
610 | 1 | _aфилософия | |
610 | 1 | _aпсихоанализ Фрейда | |
700 | 1 |
_aAverkiev _bA. _gAndrey |
|
801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20190115 _gRCR |
|
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/52272 |
942 | _cBK |