000 05422nlm1a2200433 4500
001 652370
005 20231030041136.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\17654
035 _aRU\TPU\network\13483
090 _a652370
100 _a20161220a2016 k y0rusy50 ca
101 0 _arus
_deng
102 _aRU
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aНевозможность исполнения обязательства в гражданском праве Турции и Швейцарии в контексте реформы ГК РФ: особенности рецепции и развития Ч. 2
_dImpossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish and Swiss civil law in the context of Russian civil code reform: features of reception and development P. 2
_fЕ. С. Терди
203 _aТекст
_cэлектронный
300 _aЗаглавие с экрана
320 _a[Библиогр.: с. 131-132 (19 назв.)]
330 _aПроводится анализ становления и развития институтов невозможности исполнения обязательства в Турции, Швейцарии, Германии и России. Исследование позволяет заключить: в гражданском законодательстве Турции нашла закрепление и продолжает развиваться заимствованная из швейцарского гражданского права и критикуемая современной европейской цивилистикой пандектная модель рассматриваемого института, от которой в 2002 г. отказался немецкий законодатель и лишь отдельные элементы которой реализованы в ГК РФ.
330 _aThe article is devoted to comparative analysis of creation and development of the institutions of impossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish, Swiss, German and Russian law. Amendments to Russian Civil Code in relation to impossibility of performance which came into force on June, 1 2015 are estimated. Author gives the recommendations for the future development of Russian institution of impossibility of performance taking into consideration the results of the same institutions' reforms in Turkish and German law dated 2012 and 2002, respectively, and current reform of Swiss Code of Obligations. This research is relevant due to features of studies legal institution which can be called as a «field of struggle» between different legal traditions gradually taking the form of harmonization. It was created on the basis of the doctrine of the pandect law school in the end of XIX century. So called pandect model of impossibility of performance of an obligation by German civilest Friedrich Mommsen was adopted literally or with the minor modifications by most of the countries of the Romano-Germanic legal systems during the XIX century. For example, it was realized in Swiss Code of Obligations dated 1912 and - by copying of the French version of the latter - in Turkish Code of Obligations dated 1926. Currently the institution of impossibility of performance of the obligations are under the reform influenced by the such lex mercatoria as UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, Principles of European Contract Law and Draft Common Frame of Reference. These soft law acts were created taking into consideration of the approach of the Anglo-Saxon law to the regulation of private relationship. Thus, studied legal institution can be interesting for all those interested in the phenomenon of legal globalization.
461 _tВестник Томского государственного университета. Право
_fНациональный исследовательский Томский государственный университет (ТГУ)
_d2011-
463 _t№ 2 (20)
_v[С. 121-132]
_d2016
510 1 _aImpossibility of performance of an obligation in Turkish and Swiss civil law in the context of Russian civil code reform: features of reception and development P. 2
_zeng
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _aобязательства
610 1 _aобязательственное право
610 1 _aТурция
610 1 _aШвейцария
610 1 _aГермания
610 1 _aреформы
610 1 _aRussian Federation
700 1 _aТерди
_bЕ. С.
_cспециалист в области права
_cдоцент Томского политехнического университета, кандидат юридических наук
_f1986-
_gЕкатерина Сергеевна
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36711
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
_bИнститут природных ресурсов (ИПР)
_bКафедра экономики природных ресурсов (ЭПР)
_h3659
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18668
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20161220
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.17223/22253513/20/14
942 _cCF