000 03556nlm0a2200409 4500
001 654119
005 20231030041246.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\19639
035 _aRU\TPU\network\14862
090 _a654119
100 _a20170411a2016 k y0engy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
105 _ay z 100zy
135 _adrgn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aHistorical and theoretical traditions of knowledge in management systems
_fM. V. Goncharenko [et al.]
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
330 _aAny management model used for achieving goals of an organization is conditioned by socioeconomic, ideological and scientific paradigms. These paradigms are relevant at a certain historical moment, but it doesn’t mean that they didn’t exist earlier. On the contrary, they were known and used in earlier times. The authors’ main aim is to reveal and determine the regularity, which makes it possible to use a certain management model at a given moment of the historical development as the most suitable one. Besides, the authors aimed to determine, how the knowledge of the inner nature of people’s relations influenced the development of management systems. To achieve this aim it is necessary to limit this research by the fields studied, as well as by the time periods of the management models. The authors compare the methods used to rule ancient slaves in Rome Empire with the methods of management in contemporary, modern management systems. The book ‘How to Manage Your Slaves. Marcus Sidonius Falx’ by Jerry Toner [1] serves as a starting point of the research. The authors claim that even the slavery as a social model of management disappeared long time ago, the elements of the ancient slavery management system can be found even in modern management systems. It can especially be found in the subordination “a manager-a subordinated”.
461 _tSGEM. 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts
_oconference proceedings, Albena, Bulgariaм, Aug. 24-31, 2016
_d2016
463 _tBk. 3, vol. 2
_v[P. 685-690]
_d2016
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _amanagement
610 1 _aуправление
610 1 _aсоциальный статус
610 1 _aсоциальные роли
610 1 _aмодели управления
701 1 _aGoncharenko
_bM. V.
_cspecialist in the field of psychology and pedagogy
_cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences
_f1973-
_gMark Vasilievich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33597
701 1 _aRogotneva
_bE. N.
_cSociologist
_cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of philosophical sciences
_f1976-
_gElena Nikolaevna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33824
701 1 _aDemidova
_bO. M.
_cLinguist
_cSenior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University
_f1978-
_gOlga Mikhailovna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31682
701 1 _aMichalzhova
_bE.
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
_bЭнергетический институт (ЭНИН)
_bКафедра иностранных языков энергетического института (ИЯЭИ)
_h6734
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\18680
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20211201
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttps://sgemsocial.org/ssgemlib/spip.php?article3148
942 _cCF