000 03910nam1a2200457 4500
001 655776
005 20231030041400.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\22075
090 _a655776
100 _a20170929a2017 k y0engy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
102 _aUS
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aDensity Functional Theory Study of Interface Interactions in Hydroxyapatite/Rutile Composites for Biomedical Applications
_fR. V. Tsyshevsky [et al.]
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
320 _a[References: p. 15693-15695 (78 tit.)]
330 _aTo gain insight into the nature of the adhesion mechanism between hydroxyapatite (HA) and rutile (rTiO2), the mutual affinity between their surfaces was systematically studied using density functional theory (DFT). We calculated both bulk and surface properties of HA and rTiO2, and explored the interfacial bonding mechanism of amorphous HA (aHA) surface onto amorphous as well as stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric crystalline rTiO2. Formation energies of bridging and subbridging oxygen vacancies considered in the rTiO2(110) surface were evaluated and compared with other theoretical and experimental results. The interfacial interaction was evaluated through the work of adhesion. For the aHA/rTiO2(110) interfaces, the work of adhesion is found to depend strongly on the chemical environment of the rTiO2(110) surface. Electronic analysis indicates that the charge transfer is very small in the case of interface formation between aHA and crystalline rTiO2(110). In contrast, significant charge transfer occurs between aHA and amorphous rTiO2(aTiO2) slabs during the formation of the interface. Charge density difference (CDD) analysis indicates that the dominant interactions in the interface have significant covalent character, and in particular the Ti-O and Ca-O bonds. Thus, the obtained results reveal that the aHA/aTiO2interface shows a more preferable interaction and is thermodynamically more stable than other interfaces. These results are particularly important for improving the long-term stability of HA-based implants.
333 _aРежим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
461 _tJournal of Physical Chemistry C
463 _tVol. 121, iss. 29
_v[P. 15687–15695]
_d2017
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aгидроксиапатиты
610 1 _aрутил
610 1 _aбиомедицина
610 1 _aтеория функционала плотности
610 1 _aмежфазное взаимодействие
610 1 _aадгезия
701 1 _aTsyshevsky
_bR. V.
_gRoman
701 1 _aGrubova
_bI. Yu.
_cphysicist
_cengineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic Universit
_f1989-
_gIrina Yurievna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32674
701 1 _aSurmeneva
_bM. A.
_cspecialist in the field of material science
_cengineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Associate Scientist
_f1984-
_gMaria Alexandrovna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31894
701 1 _aHuygh
_bS.
_gStijn
701 1 _aSurmenev
_bR. A.
_cphysicist
_cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Senior researcher, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences
_f1982-
_gRoman Anatolievich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31885
701 1 _aNeyts
_bE. C.
_gErik
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
_bФизико-технический институт (ФТИ)
_bКафедра экспериментальной физики (ЭФ)
_h7596
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21255
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20180221
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02926
942 _cBK