| 000 | 03827nla2a2200505 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 658083 | ||
| 005 | 20231030041537.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\25156 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\network\25141 | ||
| 090 | _a658083 | ||
| 100 | _a20180515a2018 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 105 | _ay z 100zy | ||
| 135 | _adrgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | _ai | |
| 182 | 0 | _ab | |
| 200 | 1 |
_aHumanitarian Expertise As A Tool For Creating The Image Of Well-Being Future _fV. G. Lankin, M. N. Kokarevich, T. B. Lysunets |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 320 | _a[References: p. 304 (11 tit.)] | ||
| 330 | _aThe article considers the importance of humanitarian expertise in assessing innovations and projects in social technologies. It states the basis for defining the criteria of the assessment that identify whether the innovations are centred at a man's well-being and his development as the agent of socialcultural and social interactions. The aim of the article is to specify and to give scientific credence to the humanitarian expertise of technological and social innovations revealing their direction at the well-being and the development of a person as the agent of cultural work and social interactions. The methodology of the approach implemented here is based on the logic of event. It helps to conceptualize the future in its balance with the present and, in particular, to apply the differential rendering of modality of the eventual in the notions of logically possible, actualizable, admissible and probable. The outcome of the work proves the idea that while specifying the criteria it is important to base them on the principle of optimum which can be expressed in terms of safety, well-being, identity and development. The aspect of wellbeing reflects the optimum in the balance of material-spiritual in a man's reality and in this respect it can serve as one of the most important criteria of humanitarian expertise. The authors emphasize the challenges of the innovations in the field of human reality alteration that are manifested in the posthuman discourse and in the modern theories of educational system reforming. | ||
| 461 | 0 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\11959 _tThe European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS) |
|
| 463 | 0 |
_0(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\25098 _tVol. 38 : Lifelong Wellbeing in the World (WELLSO 2017) _oIV International Scientific Symposium, 11-15 September 2017, Tomsk, Russian Federation _o[proceedings] _fNational Research Tomsk Polytechnic University (TPU) ; eds. F. Casati, G. A. Barysheva, W. Krieger _v[P. 294-304] _d2018 |
|
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _ahumanitarian expertise | |
| 610 | 1 | _aanticipation | |
| 610 | 1 | _aassessment | |
| 610 | 1 | _awell-being | |
| 610 | 1 | _acriteria | |
| 610 | 1 | _aoptimum balance | |
| 610 | 1 | _aпрогнозирование | |
| 610 | 1 | _aоценка | |
| 610 | 1 | _aблагосостояние | |
| 610 | 1 | _aкритерии | |
| 610 | 1 | _aгуманитарная экспертиза | |
| 610 | 1 | _aблагополучие | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aLankin _bV. G. |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aKokarevich _bM. N. |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aLysunets _bT. B. _cLinguist _cSenior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University _f1976- _gTatiana Borisovna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33128 |
|
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола базовой инженерной подготовки _bОтделение иностранных языков _h8029 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23510 |
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20180518 _gRCR |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.04.32 | |
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/47232 | |
| 942 | _cCF | ||