000 03125nlm0a2200385 4500
001 659541
005 20231030041632.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\28146
090 _a659541
100 _a20190226a2018 k y0engy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
105 _ay z 100zy
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 0 _aCrowd-based Multi-Predicate Screening of Papers in Literature Reviews
_fE. Krivosheev, F. Casati, B. Benatallah
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
330 _aSystematic literature reviews (SLRs) are one of the most commonand useful form of scientific research and publication. Tens of thousands of SLRs are published each year, and this rate is growingacross all fields of science. Performing an accurate, complete andunbiased SLR is however a difficult and expensive endeavor. Thisis true in general for all phases of a literature review, and in particular for the paper screening phase, where authors filter a set ofpotentially in-scope papers based on a number of exclusion criteria.To address the problem, in recent years the research communityhas began to explore the use of the crowd to allow for a faster, accurate, cheaper and unbiased screening of papers. Initial results showthat crowdsourcing can be effective, even for relatively complexreviews. In this paper we derive and analyze a set of strategies for crowdbased screening, and show that an adaptive strategy, that continuously re-assesses the statistical properties of the problem to minimize the number of votes needed to take decisions for each paper,significantly outperforms a number of non-adaptive approachesin terms of cost and accuracy. We validate both applicability andresults of the approach through a set of crowdsourcing experiments, and discuss properties of the problem and algorithms thatwe believe to be generally of interest for classification problemswhere items are classified via a series of successive tests (as it oftenhappens in medicine).
463 _tWorld Wide Web Conference (WWW 2018)
_oproceedings, Lyon, France, April 23-27, 2018
_v[P. 55-64]
_d2018
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _ahuman computation
610 1 _aclassification
610 1 _aliterature reviews
610 1 _aвычисления
610 1 _aклассификации
610 1 _aобзоры литературы
700 1 _aKrivosheev
_bE.
_gEvgeny
701 1 _aCasati
_bF.
_cItalian economist and Professor at the University of Trento (Italy)
_cProfessor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of technical Sciences
_f1971-
_gFabio
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39820
701 1 _aBenatallah
_bB.
_gBoualem
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
_bШкола инженерного предпринимательства
_c(2017- )
_h7949
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23544
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20190226
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3178876.3186036
942 _cCF