000 04014nlm1a2200481 4500
001 659730
005 20231030041639.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\28501
035 _aRU\TPU\network\28473
090 _a659730
100 _a20190326a2018 k y0engy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
102 _aUS
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aComparative Evaluation of Radioiodine and Technetium-Labeled DARPin 9_29 for Radionuclide Molecular Imaging of HER2 Expression in Malignant Tumors
_fA. G. Vorobjeva (Vorobyeva), O. G. Bragina, M. Altai [et al.]
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
320 _a[References: 47 tit.]
330 _aHigh expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast and gastroesophageal carcinomas is a predictive biomarker for treatment using HER2-targeted therapeutics (antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab DM1, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib). Radionuclide molecular imaging of HER2 expression might permit stratification of patients for HER2-targeting therapies. In this study, we evaluated a new HER2-imaging probe based on the designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) 9_29. DARPin 9_29 was labeled with iodine-125 by direct radioiodination and with [99mTc]Tc(CO)3using the C-terminal hexahistidine tag. DARPin 9_29 preserved high specificity and affinity of binding to HER2-expressing cells after labeling. Uptake of [125I]I-DARPin 9_29 and [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-DARPin 9_29 in HER2-positive SKOV-3 xenografts in mice at 6 h after injection was 3.4 ± 0.7 %ID/g and 2.9 ± 0.7 %ID/g, respectively. This was significantly () higher than the uptake of the same probes in HER2-negative Ramos lymphoma xenografts, 0.22 ± 0.09 %ID/g and 0.30 ± 0.05 %ID/g, respectively. Retention of [125I]I-DARPin 9_29 in the lung, liver, spleen, and kidneys was appreciably lower compared with [99mTc]Tc(CO)3-DARPin 9_29, which resulted in significantly () higher tumor-to-organ ratios. The biodistribution data were confirmed by SPECT/CT imaging. In conclusion, radioiodine is a preferable label for DARPin 9_29.
461 _tContrast Media & Molecular Imaging (CMMI)
463 _tVol. 2018
_v[6930425, 11 p.]
_d2018
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _aсравнительная оценка
610 1 _aрадиоактивный йод
610 1 _aтехнеций
610 1 _aрадионуклидная диагностика
610 1 _aзлокачественные опухоли
701 1 _aVorobjeva (Vorobyeva)
_bA. G.
_cspecialist in the field of medical technology
_cSenior Researcher, Oncoteranostika Research Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Ph.D
_f1990-
_gAnzhelika Grigorjevna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\46556
701 1 _aBragina
_bO. G.
_gOlga Gennadjevna
701 1 _aAltai
_bM.
_gMohamed
701 1 _aOrlova
_bA.
_gAnna
701 1 _aSchulga
_bA. A.
_gAleksey Anatoljevich
701 1 _aProshkina
_bG. M.
_gGalina Mikhaylovna
701 1 _aChernov
_bV. I.
_cspecialist in the field of medical technology
_clead engineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of medical sciences
_f1962-
_gVladimir Ivanovich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34191
701 1 _aTolmachev
_bV. M.
_gVladimir Mikhaylovich
701 1 _aDeev
_bS. M.
_cbiologist
_cthe expert of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of biological Sciences
_gSergey Mikhaylovich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39299
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет (ТПУ)
_bФизико-технический институт (ФТИ)
_bЛаборатория № 31 ядерного реактора (Лаборатория № 31 ЯР)
_h6471
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\20054
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20210204
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6930425
942 _cCF