000			02448nlm1a2200373 4500
001			660817
005			20231030041724.0
035			_a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\30833
035			_aRU\TPU\network\30779
090			_a660817
100			_a20191024a2019 k y0engy50 ba
101	0		_aeng
102			_aGB
135			_adrcn ---uucaa
181		0	_ai
182		0	_ab
200	1		_aWeighted networks: the issue of dichotomization _fR. Baggio
203			_aText _celectronic
300			_aTitle screen
330			_aThe purpose of this methodological paper is to explore one issue in the analysis of complex networks when weights are used to value edges. Often these weights are removed by setting a threshold and considering the links existing only if their value is higher than this. This practice allows then using simpler metrics as provided by many software packages. However, many common network properties, which often lead to specific interpretations, can be highly sensitive to the assumptions and thresholds used. By discussing a case, we show the differences that arise when dichotomizing a weighted network. We conclude that while unweighted networks can provide insights into some structural properties, the operation can be unnecessary and even detrimental for studying many features and processes when valued relational data are available.
333			_aРежим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
461			_tInternational Journal of Tourism Sciences
463			_tVol. 19, iss.1 _v[P. 59-64] _d2019
610	1		_aэлектронный ресурс
610	1		_aтруды учёных ТПУ
610	1		_anetwork analysis
610	1		_aweighted networks
610	1		_adichotomization
610	1		_aсетевой анализ
700		1	_aBaggio _bR. _cItalian expert, philosopher _cProfessor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of philosophical Sciences _f1951- _gRodolfo _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39762
712	0	2	_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола базовой инженерной подготовки _bОтделение социально-гуманитарных наук _h8033 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512
801		2	_aRU _b63413507 _c20191024 _gRCR
856	4	0	_uhttps://doi.org/10.1080/15980634.2019.1592311
942			_cCF