000 03636nlm1a2200505 4500
001 662319
005 20231030041817.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\33456
035 _aRU\TPU\network\30674
090 _a662319
100 _a20200715a2020 k y0engy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aClay Minerals and Detrital Material in Paleocene–Eocene Biogenic Siliceous Rocks (Sw Western Siberia): Implications for Volcanic and Depositional Environment Record
_fP. V. Smirnov, O. I. Deryagina, N. I. Afanasjeva [et al.]
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
320 _a[References: 45 tit.]
330 _aThe paper presents the results of a study on clay minerals and detrital material of biosiliceous rocks (Paleocene–Eocene) from three sections in the Transuralian region. The authigenic processes in sediments resulted in the formation of dioctahedral clay minerals (illite, smectite) and insignificant amounts of sulfide phases (pyrite, hydrotroillite). Detrital minerals from the studied diatomites and diatomaceous clays often have a subangular and semi-rounded habit that is evidence of a low degree alteration of the sedimentary material in the provenance areas. The high degree of preservation of the bioclastic debris and the transformation of the limited volcanogenic substratum in clay minerals apparently was possible by initial burial diagenesis. The morphology of kaolinite and illite suggests that these mineral formations were caused by diagenesis with feldspars and smectites as a substrate for their formation. The smectite zone of weathering crust that developed on the adjacent land could have also served as a significant source of smectites entering the sea basin. The association with smectite in aggregates of mixed clayey composition indicates a sequential smectite-to-illite reaction via mixed-layered minerals. Such minerals as amphiboles, pyroxenes, and olivines, semi-stable to transportation and genetically associated with ultramafic rocks, form a significant part of the clastic fraction of the rock, indicating the proximity of provenance areas. This is the evident reason that the provenance areas made of mafic and ultramafic rocks played an essential role.
461 _tGeosciences
463 _tVol. 10, iss. 5
_v[162, 19 p.]
_d2020
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _asiliceous rocks
610 1 _adiatomite
610 1 _adiatomaceous clays
610 1 _aTransuralian region
610 1 _aWestern Siberia
610 1 _aPETM
610 1 _aкремнистые породы
610 1 _aдиатомиты
610 1 _aдиатомовые глины
610 1 _aЗауралье
610 1 _aЗападная Сибирь
701 1 _aSmirnov
_bP. V.
_gPavel
701 1 _aDeryagina
_bO. I.
_gOksana
701 1 _aAfanasjeva
_bN. I.
_gNadezhda
701 1 _aRudmin
_bM. A.
_cgeologist
_cEngineer-researcher of Tomsk Polytechnic University
_f1989-
_gMaksim Andreevich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\33254
701 1 _aGursky
_bH. J.
_gHans Jurgen
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
_bИнженерная школа природных ресурсов
_bОтделение геологии
_h8083
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23542
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20210514
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/65337
856 4 _uhttps://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10050162
942 _cCF