000 06142nlm1a2200529 4500
001 664128
005 20231030041919.0
035 _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35312
035 _aRU\TPU\network\35305
090 _a664128
100 _a20210329a2019 k y0rusy50 ba
101 0 _aeng
102 _aKZ
135 _adrcn ---uucaa
181 0 _ai
182 0 _ab
200 1 _aIs welfare the correlation unity or the struggle of its components? (Based on the data of the countries of the former Soviet Union)
_fO. V. Pozharnitskaya, E. G. Matyugina, G. Yu. Boyarko [et al.]
203 _aText
_celectronic
300 _aTitle screen
320 _a[References: p. 173-174 (36 tit.)]
330 _aThe article is to present such welfare components as human development index, economic growth, energy consumption, ecological condition. The object of the research is the dynamics of the welfare of countries from the former Soviet Union. For evaluation a set of such criteria as gross domestic product per capita, human development index and energy consumption per capita have been used. In addition such indicators as gross domestic product per unit of energy use; emissions of СО2, methane and greenhouse gases per capita, and area of forests have also been investigated. Factual data for the period 1997-2015 have been used. The research is related to the common stages of the transformation and parameters of the development of countries from the former Soviet Union over a certain period of time. Nevertheless, countries that have a common past have demonstrated a significant variation in the dependencies of the studied indicators. Based on the results of the correlation analysis, a group of countries showing a high dependence on all the welfare criteria on the factors considered (Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus) has been chosen. A positive correlation of human development index has been found in codependency of human development index and gross domestic product per unit of energy use. A positive correlation of gross domestic product per capita indicator has been found in codependency of gross domestic product per capita and gross domestic product per unit of energy use; gross domestic product per capita and CH4 per capita (exception Ukraine).
330 _aA study of dependencies allows us to equate economic growth and welfare. It is common for the countries from the former Soviet Union (correlation coefficient for most countries is 0.95) between economic growth rates and energy consumption, as well as energy consumption and CO2 emissions (correlation coefficient 0.85-0.997). All countries show an obvious dependence of economic growth on energy consumed. A slightly weaker correlation has been noticed in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. A negative correlation between energy consumption per person and gross domestic product per unit of energy use has been found in Uzbekistan. The reason is the growth of the population in spite of the decrease in energy consumption. A negative correlation between the gross domestic product per capita and the forest area is common for Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, which have a small forest fund. The data obtained allowed us to classify countries according to the level of energy consumption and dependence on the sources of natural resources. Energy consumption as a welfare criterion has its own specific number of dependencies. It is this criterion that has the maximum number of dependencies with a strong negative correlation for countries from the former Soviet Union. That lays the groundwork for expanding the list of correlating factors in future research.
333 _aРежим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса
461 _tBulletin of the National academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan
463 _t№ 1
_v[P. 162-174]
_d2019
610 1 _aэлектронный ресурс
610 1 _aтруды учёных ТПУ
610 1 _awelfare
610 1 _ahuman development index
610 1 _aeconomic growth
610 1 _aenergy consumption
610 1 _aCO2 emissions
610 1 _aэкономический рост
610 1 _aблагосостояние
610 1 _aпотребление
610 1 _aэнергия
701 1 _aPozharnitskaya
_bO. V.
_ceconomist
_cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences
_f1972-
_gOlga Vyacheslavovna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\34018
701 1 _aMatyugina
_bE. G.
_ceconomist
_cProfessor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, doctor of economic sciences
_f1971-
_gEleonora Grigorievna
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35836
701 1 _aBoyarko
_bG. Yu.
_ceconomist
_cHead of the Department of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of economic sciences
_f1954-
_gGrigory Yurievich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\32222
701 1 _aMitsel
_bA. A.
_cmathematician
_cProfessor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Doctor of technical sciences
_f1947-
_gArtur Aleksandrovich
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35618
701 1 _aVaganova
_bE. V.
_gElena Vladimirovna
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
_bШкола инженерного предпринимательства
_c(2017- )
_h7949
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23544
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
_bИнженерная школа природных ресурсов
_bОтделение нефтегазового дела
_h8084
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23546
712 0 2 _aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет
_bИнженерная школа ядерных технологий
_bОтделение экспериментальной физики
_h7865
_2stltpush
_3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23549
801 2 _aRU
_b63413507
_c20210329
_gRCR
856 4 _uhttps://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.19
942 _cCF