| 000 | 03147nlm1a2200469 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 664604 | ||
| 005 | 20231030041935.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35788 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\network\35787 | ||
| 090 | _a664604 | ||
| 100 | _a20210429a2021 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 135 | _aarnn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | _ai | |
| 182 | 0 | _ab | |
| 200 | 1 |
_aStudies of charm and beauty hadron long-range correlations in pp and pPb collisions at LHC energies _fА. М. Sirunyan, A. R. Tumasyan, W. Adam [et al.] |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 320 | _a[References.: 80 tit.] | ||
| 330 | _aMeasurements of the second Fourier harmonic coefficient () of the azimuthal distributions of prompt and nonprompt D0 mesons produced in and collisions are presented. Nonprompt D0 mesons come from beauty hadron decays. The data samples are collected by the CMS experiment at nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energies of 13 and 8.16 TeV, respectively. In high multiplicity collisions, signals for prompt charm hadrons are reported for the first time, and are found to be comparable to those for light-flavor hadron species over a transverse momentum () range of 2–6 GeV. Compared at similar event multiplicities, the prompt D0 meson values in and collisions are similar in magnitude. The values for open beauty hadrons are extracted for the first time via nonprompt D0 mesons in collisions. For in the range of 2–5 GeV, the results suggest that for nonprompt D0 mesons is smaller than that for prompt D0 mesons. These new measurements indicate a positive charm hadron in collisions and suggest a mass dependence in between charm and beauty hadrons in the system. These results provide insights into the origin of heavy-flavor quark collectivity in small systems. | ||
| 461 | _tPhysics Letters B | ||
| 463 |
_tVol. 813 _v[136036, 25 p.] _d2021 |
||
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _aCMS | |
| 610 | 1 | _aridge | |
| 610 | 1 | _acollectivity | |
| 610 | 1 | _asmall systems | |
| 610 | 1 | _aheavy flavor | |
| 610 | 1 | _aelliptic flow | |
| 701 | 1 |
_aSirunyan _bА. М. |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aTumasyan _bA. R. |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aAdam _bW. _gWolfgang |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aAmbrogi _bF. _gFederico |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aBergauer _bT. _gThomas |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aTyurin _bN. E. _gNikolay Evgenjevich |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aBabaev _bA. A. _cphysicist _cengineer-issledovatelskogo Polytechnic University, candidate of physical and mathematical Sciences _f1981- _gAnton Anatoljevich _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35154 |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aOkhotnikov _bV. V. _cphysicist _cengineer of Tomsk Polytechnic University _f1992- _gVitaly Vladimirovich _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36453 |
|
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bИсследовательская школа физики высокоэнергетических процессов _c(2017- ) _h8118 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23551 |
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20211210 _gRCR |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136036 | |
| 942 | _cCF | ||