| 000 | 05710nlm1a2200517 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 664772 | ||
| 005 | 20231030041941.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\35956 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\network\18852 | ||
| 090 | _a664772 | ||
| 100 | _a20210518a2018 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 135 | _adrgn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | _ai | |
| 182 | 0 | _ab | |
| 200 | 1 |
_aLabor Indicators and Manufacturing Companies Ownership Patterns in Russia and its Regions: Results of Quantitative Analysis _fV. V. Spitsin, A. A. Mikhalchuk, I. A. Pavlova, L. Yu. Spitsina (Spitsyna) |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 320 | _a[References: 43 tit.] | ||
| 330 | _aResearch background: There has been an extensive process of foreign and joint ownership enterprises establishment in the Russian economy since 2006. Domestic manufacturing industry experiences certain pressure on behalf of foreign direct investment bringing new technologies and higher labor requirements. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to investigate differences in employment strategies and labor indicators in the case of enterprises in foreign and joint ownership (FJO) and domestic enterprises in Russian ownership (RO). We analyze the manufacturing industry in Russia and its regions under conditions of stable and crisis periods. Methods: The study enhances the analysis of Rosstat's statistical data for 2005- 2016 and applies ANOVA method to compare the employment results for companies with different ownership patterns. The research is carried out both at the national level of the Russian Federation and at the regional level with the breakdown of the regions. Findings & Value added: The study identifies significant decline in employment and increase in productivity for the period of 2005-2016. In contrast to the crisis of 2008-2009, in 2014-2016 there has been no sharp drop in employment. However, there is a substantial decline in real salaries which is comparable to the crisis of 2008-2009. According to ANOVA, statistically significant differences in labor indicators between FJO and RO companies are manifested. RO companies dominate in employment and payroll funds while FJO enterprises have better productivity results with a higher average salary. FJO companies demonstrated faster growth in employment and payroll fund in relatively stable conditions (2012-2013). However, they reacted with a significant reduction in employment for a new crisis (2014-2016), although the creation of new FJO enterprises continued in separate regions of Russia. The results can be used in social policy to regulate the employment and earnings of industrial workers in the current economic conditions. | ||
| 461 | _tOeconomia Copernicana | ||
| 463 |
_tVol. 9, No. 2 _v[P. 261-285] _d2018 |
||
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _aforeign direct investments (FDI) | |
| 610 | 1 | _amanufacturing industry | |
| 610 | 1 | _aemployment effects | |
| 610 | 1 | _aeconomic productivity | |
| 610 | 1 | _aeconomic crisis | |
| 610 | 1 | _aиностранные инвестиции | |
| 610 | 1 | _aобрабатывающая промышленность | |
| 610 | 1 | _aзанятость | |
| 610 | 1 | _aпроизводительность | |
| 610 | 1 | _aэкономический кризис | |
| 701 | 1 |
_aSpitsin _bV. V. _ceconomist _cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences _f1976- _gVladislav Vladimirovich _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\30957 |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aMikhalchuk _bA. A. _cmathematician _cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences _f1954- _gAleksandr Alexandrovich _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31925 |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aPavlova _bI. A. _ceconomist _cSenior Lecturer of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of Sciences _f1979- _gIrina Anatolievna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\36422 |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aSpitsina (Spitsyna) _bL. Yu. _cEconomist _cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences _f1976- _gLubov Yurievna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\35245 |
|
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола инженерного предпринимательства _c(2017- ) _h7949 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23544 |
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола базовой инженерной подготовки _bОтделение математики и информатики _h8031 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23555 |
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bИнститут социально-гуманитарных технологий _bКафедра экономики _bМеждународная научно-образовательная лаборатория технологий улучшения благополучия пожилых людей _h7381 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21257 |
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола базовой инженерной подготовки _bОтделение социально-гуманитарных наук _h8033 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23512 |
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20211209 _gRCR |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttp://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/11683/69106 | |
| 856 | 4 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2018.014 | |
| 942 | _cCF | ||