| 000 | 03542nlm1a2200421 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 665204 | ||
| 005 | 20231030041955.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\36403 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\network\31513 | ||
| 090 | _a665204 | ||
| 100 | _a20210902a2020 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 102 | _aUS | ||
| 135 | _adrcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | _ai | |
| 182 | 0 | _ab | |
| 200 | 1 |
_aA Systematic Review on Technology-Supported Interventions to Improve Old-Age Social Wellbeing: Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Connectedness _fF. Ibarra, M. Baez, L. Cernuzzi, F. Casati |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 320 | _a[References: 63 tit.] | ||
| 330 | _aBackground. This review studies technology-supported interventions to help older adults, living in situations of reduced mobility, overcome loneliness, and social isolation. The focus is on long-distance interactions, investigating the (i) challenges addressed and strategies applied; (ii) technology used in interventions; and (iii) social interactions enabled. Methods. We conducted a search on Elsevier's Scopus database for related work published until January 2020, focusing on (i) intervention studies supported mainly by technology-mediated communication, (ii) aiming at supported virtual social interactions between people, and (iii) evaluating the impact of loneliness or social isolation. Results. Of the 1178 papers screened, 25 met the inclusion criteria. Computer and Internet training was the dominant strategy, allowing access to communication technologies, while in recent years, we see more studies aiming to provide simple, easy-to-use technology. The technology used was mostly off-the-shelf, with fewer solutions tailored to older adults. Social interactions targeted mainly friends and family, and most interventions focused on more than one group of people. Discussion. All interventions reported positive results, suggesting feasibility. However, more research is needed on the topic (especially randomized controlled trials), as evidenced by the low number of interventions found. We recommend more rigorous methods, addressing human factors and reporting technology usage in future research. | ||
| 461 | _tJournal of Healthcare Engineering | ||
| 463 |
_tVol. 2020 _v[2036842, 14 p.] _d2020 |
||
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _aсоциальное благополучие | |
| 610 | 1 | _aпожилые люди | |
| 610 | 1 | _aсоциальная изоляция | |
| 610 | 1 | _aодиночество | |
| 610 | 1 | _aкоммуникации | |
| 701 | 1 |
_aIbarra _bF. _gFrancisco |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aBaez _bM. _gMarcos |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aCernuzzi _bL. _gLuca |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aCasati _bF. _cItalian economist and Professor at the University of Trento (Italy) _cProfessor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, candidate of technical Sciences _f1971- _gFabio _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\39820 |
|
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bИнститут социально-гуманитарных технологий _bКафедра экономики _bМеждународная научно-образовательная лаборатория технологий улучшения благополучия пожилых людей _h7381 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\21257 |
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20210902 _gRCR |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2036842 | |
| 942 | _cCF | ||