| 000 | 03265nlm1a2200553 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 668253 | ||
| 005 | 20231030042142.0 | ||
| 035 | _a(RuTPU)RU\TPU\network\39477 | ||
| 035 | _aRU\TPU\network\36315 | ||
| 090 | _a668253 | ||
| 100 | _a20220707a2022 k y0engy50 ba | ||
| 101 | 0 | _aeng | |
| 135 | _adrcn ---uucaa | ||
| 181 | 0 | _ai | |
| 182 | 0 | _ab | |
| 200 | 1 |
_aPath dependence and regional disparities in single-industry towns in Russia: the evidence from micro data _fI. S. Antonova, S. A. Pchelintsev |
|
| 203 |
_aText _celectronic |
||
| 300 | _aTitle screen | ||
| 330 | _aThis article aims to contribute to the debate on path dependence and lock-in mechanism at the micro data in single-industry towns, which in turn extremely highly concentrate in three regions Kemerovo, Sverdlovsk and Chelyabinsk in Russia. The empirical context is five-year panel data on 38 single-industry towns. We offer the alternative micro data to evaluate entropy, the number of newly created enterprises, social payments and cash incomes and aggregated revenues of the single-industry towns. Testing the U-shaped dependence, we conclude that the relation between diversification and incomes per capita coordinates with U-shape relevance at comparative low-level income. The argument follows from the nonlinear model between them. The regression models identify both traditional factors of urban development and micro data. The authors link the further development of single-industry towns in these regions with path creation and new linkage development. | ||
| 333 | _aРежим доступа: по договору с организацией-держателем ресурса | ||
| 461 | _tInternational Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies | ||
| 463 |
_tVol. 16, iss. 2, 3, 4 _v[P. 318-343] _d2022 |
||
| 610 | 1 | _aэлектронный ресурс | |
| 610 | 1 | _aтруды учёных ТПУ | |
| 610 | 1 | _apath dependence | |
| 610 | 1 | _asingle-industry town | |
| 610 | 1 | _acompany town | |
| 610 | 1 | _acore industry | |
| 610 | 1 | _adiversification | |
| 610 | 1 | _aspatial disparities | |
| 610 | 1 | _ataxation incentives | |
| 610 | 1 | _aKemerovo region | |
| 610 | 1 | _aChelyabinsk region | |
| 610 | 1 | _aSverdlovsk region | |
| 610 | 1 | _aRussia | |
| 610 | 1 | _aмоногорода | |
| 610 | 1 | _aдиверсификация | |
| 610 | 1 | _aдиспропорции | |
| 610 | 1 | _aналоговые льготы | |
| 610 | 1 | _aКемеровская область | |
| 610 | 1 | _aЧелябинская область | |
| 610 | 1 | _aСвердловская область | |
| 610 | 1 | _aРоссия | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aAntonova _bI. S. _cspecialist in the field of management _cAssociate Professor of Tomsk Polytechnic University, Candidate of economic sciences _f1985- _gIrina Sergeevna _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\pers\31961 |
|
| 701 | 1 |
_aPchelintsev _bS. A. _gSergey Anatoljevich |
|
| 712 | 0 | 2 |
_aНациональный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет _bШкола инженерного предпринимательства _c(2017- ) _h7949 _2stltpush _3(RuTPU)RU\TPU\col\23544 |
| 801 | 2 |
_aRU _b63413507 _c20230329 _gRCR |
|
| 856 | 4 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2021.10040341 | |
| 942 | _cCF | ||