Peircean studies in Russia: A historical and cross-cultural perspective / N. A. Lukianova, E. V. Fell
Уровень набора: Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of CommunicationЯзык: английский.Резюме или реферат: This article aims to contribute to the Peircean studies by providing an account of the reception of Peirce’s philosophy in Russian academia. Peirce was introduced to Russian scholarship at the beginning of the twentieth century, but Russian scholars’ work on Peirce remains unnoticed for the most part in the international academic world. Presenting an outline of their research fills a certain gap in the Peircean studies demonstrating how Peirce was received in imperial Russia, the USSR and post-Soviet Russian academia. This overview can also serve, to some extent, as a contribution to the studies in cross-cultural communication, because the authors present Russian philosophers’ take on an American philosopher considered in the context of the changing historical and cultural landscape. From being introduced to Peirce via a francophone scholar at the beginning of the twentieth century to criticizing Peirce from the stance of dialectical materialism during the Cold War and exploring Peirce’s original work from various angles in the recent decades, Russophone academics could not avoid being affected by the complexity of cross-cultural communication..Примечания о наличии в документе библиографии/указателя: [References: 9 tit.].Аудитория: .Тематика: электронный ресурс | труды учёных ТПУ | American studies | Peirce | Russian academia | Yury Melvil | cross-cultural communication | pragmatism | semiotics | the USSR | исследования | Российская академия наук | Юрий Мельвиль | межкультурное общение | прагматизм | семиотика | СССР Ресурсы он-лайн:Щелкните здесь для доступа в онлайнTitle screen
[References: 9 tit.]
This article aims to contribute to the Peircean studies by providing an account of the reception of Peirce’s philosophy in Russian academia. Peirce was introduced to Russian scholarship at the beginning of the twentieth century, but Russian scholars’ work on Peirce remains unnoticed for the most part in the international academic world. Presenting an outline of their research fills a certain gap in the Peircean studies demonstrating how Peirce was received in imperial Russia, the USSR and post-Soviet Russian academia. This overview can also serve, to some extent, as a contribution to the studies in cross-cultural communication, because the authors present Russian philosophers’ take on an American philosopher considered in the context of the changing historical and cultural landscape. From being introduced to Peirce via a francophone scholar at the beginning of the twentieth century to criticizing Peirce from the stance of dialectical materialism during the Cold War and exploring Peirce’s original work from various angles in the recent decades, Russophone academics could not avoid being affected by the complexity of cross-cultural communication.
Для данного заглавия нет комментариев.